RFC266 - Network host status

时间:2005-02-10 来源: 作者: 点击:
Network Working Group Ellen Westheimer RFC#266 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. NIC #7814 8 November 1971 Categories: F, G, 3 Updates: RFC255 Obsoletes: None NETWORK HOST STATUS This RFCreports on the status of most.Network Hosts from October 26 to Novem
  Network Working Group Ellen Westheimer
RFC#266 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
NIC #7814 8 November 1971
Categories: F, G, 3
Updates: RFC255
Obsoletes: None

NETWORK HOST STATUS

This RFCreports on the status of most.Network Hosts from October 26
to November 5. (Massachusetts celebrated Armistice day on Monday,
October 25.) During these two weeks the general status of these hosts
remained as it had been previously.

The table on the following page summarizes the daily information on
host status for this period.

[Page 1]

NETWORK
ADDRESS SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (EASTERN)
------- ---- -------- ----------------------------
T W Th F M T W Th F
10/26 10/27 10/28 10/29 11/1 11/2 11/3 11/4 11/5
1430 1200 1300 1300 1630 1330 1330 1330 1330
1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O O O T O T O O O
*65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O D O O O O O O O
2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 O O O O D O D O O
66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D D D D D D
3 UCSB IBM-360/75 D O O O O D D O O
4 UTAH PDP-10 T T T D D D D D T
69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 D O D D O O O O O
6 MIT(MULTICS) H-645 O D D O O O O T O
70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 D H T O O O O O T
8 SDC IBM-360/67 D D D D D D D D D
9 HARVARD PDP-10 D D T D D D D D D
10 LINCOLN IBM-360/67 H D H T T H H D H

where

D= Dead (Destination Host either dead or inaccessible [due to network
partitioning or local IMP failure] from the BBN Terminal IMP.)

R= Refused (Destination Host returned a CLS to the initial RFC.)

T= Timed out (Destination Host did not respond in any way to the
initial RFC, although not dead.)

H= 1/2 Open (Destination Host opened a connection but then either
immediately closed it, or did not respond any further.)

O= Open (Destination Host opened a connection and was accessible to
users.)

* The UCLA IBM-360/91 currently has Remote Job Service (NETRJS), but
has not implemented a full server Telnet System. The BBN Terminal
IMP is not equipped to test NETRJS; however, we are assuming that
receipt of the UCLA explanatory message indicates that NETRJS is also
functioning.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
------分隔线----------------------------
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 密码: 验证码:
推荐内容