RFC1035 - Domain names - implementation and specification(3)

时间:2005-02-12 来源: 作者: 点击:
RFC-812 , Network Information Center, SRI International, March 1982. [ RFC-819 ] Z. Su, and J. Postel, "The Domain Naming Convention for Internet User Applications", RFC-819 , Network Information Cen
  RFC-812,
Network Information Center, SRI International, March
1982.

[RFC-819] Z. Su, and J. Postel, "The Domain Naming Convention for
Internet User Applications", RFC-819, Network
Information Center, SRI International, August 1982.

Early thoughts on the design of the domain system.
Current implementation is completely different.

[RFC-821] J. Postel, "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC-821,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.

[RFC-830] Z. Su, "A Distributed System for Internet Name Service",
RFC-830, Network Information Center, SRI International,
October 1982.

Early thoughts on the design of the domain system.
Current implementation is completely different.

[RFC-882] P. Mockapetris, "Domain names - Concepts and
Facilities," RFC-882, USC/Information Sciences
Institute, November 1983.

Superceeded by this memo.

[RFC-883] P. Mockapetris, "Domain names - Implementation and
Specification," RFC-883, USC/Information Sciences
Institute, November 1983.

Superceeded by this memo.

[RFC-920] J. Postel and J. Reynolds, "Domain Requirements",
RFC-920, USC/Information Sciences Institute,
October 1984.

Explains the naming scheme for top level domains.

[RFC-952] K. Harrenstien, M. Stahl, E. Feinler, "DoD Internet Host
Table Specification", RFC-952, SRI, October 1985.

Specifies the format of HOSTS.TXT, the host/address
table replaced by the DNS.

[RFC-953] K. Harrenstien, M. Stahl, E. Feinler, "HOSTNAME Server",
RFC-953, SRI, October 1985.

This RFCcontains the official specification of the
hostname server protocol, which is obsoleted by the DNS.
This TCP based protocol accesses information stored in
the RFC-952 format, and is used to obtain copies of the
host table.

[RFC-973] P. Mockapetris, "Domain System Changes and
Observations", RFC-973, USC/Information Sciences
Institute, January 1986.

Describes changes to RFC-882 and RFC-883 and reasons for
them.

[RFC-974] C. Partridge, "Mail routing and the domain system",
RFC-974, CSNET CIC BBN Labs, January 1986.

Describes the transition from HOSTS.TXT based mail
addressing to the more powerful MX system used with the
domain system.

[RFC-1001] NetBIOS Working Group, "Protocol standard for a NetBIOS
service on a TCP/UDP transport: Concepts and Methods",
RFC-1001, March 1987.

This RFCand RFC-1002 are a preliminary design for
NETBIOS on top of TCP/IP which proposes to base NetBIOS
name service on top of the DNS.

[RFC-1002] NetBIOS Working Group, "Protocol standard for a NetBIOS
service on a TCP/UDP transport: Detailed
Specifications", RFC-1002, March 1987.

[RFC-1010] J. Reynolds, and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC-1010,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, May 1987.

Contains socket numbers and mnemonics for host names,
operating systems, etc.

[RFC-1031] W. Lazear, "MILNET Name Domain Transition", RFC-1031,
November 1987.

Describes a plan for converting the MILNET to the DNS.

[RFC-1032] M. Stahl, "Establishing a Domain - Guidelines for
Administrators", RFC-1032, November 1987.

Describes the registration policies used by the NIC to
administer the top level domains and delegate subzones.

[RFC-1033] M. Lottor, "Domain Administrators Operations Guide",
RFC-1033, November 1987.

A cookbook for domain administrators.

[Solomon 82] M. Solomon, L. Landweber, and D. Neuhengen, "The CSNET
Name Server", Computer Networks, vol 6, nr 3, July 1982.

Describes a name service for CSNET which is independent
from the DNS and DNS use in the CSNET.

Index

* 13

; 33, 35

<character-string> 35
<domain-name> 34

@ 35

\ 35

A 12

Byte order 8

CH 13
Character case 9
CLASS 11
CNAME 12
Completion 42
CS 13

Hesiod 13
HINFO 12
HS 13

IN 13
IN-ADDR.ARPA domain 22
Inverse queries 40

Mailbox names 47
MB 12
MD 12
MF 12
MG 12
MINFO 12
MINIMUM 20
MR 12
MX 12

NS 12
NULL 12

Port numbers 32
Primary server 5
PTR 12, 18

QCLASS 13
QTYPE 12

RDATA 12
RDLENGTH 11

Secondary server 5
SOA 12
Stub resolvers 7

TCP 32
TXT 12
TYPE 11

UDP 32

WKS 12
------分隔线----------------------------
顶一下
(1)
100%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 密码: 验证码:
推荐内容