RFC3546 - Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions(2)

时间:2005-02-17 来源: 作者: 点击:
Security considerations: The security considerations of [X509-4th] and [PKIX] (or any updates to them) apply, as well as those of any protocol that uses this type (e.g., TLS). Note that this type onl
  

Security considerations:
The security considerations of [X509-4th] and [PKIX] (or any
updates to them) apply, as well as those of any protocol that uses
this type (e.g., TLS).

Note that this type only specifies a certificate chain that can be
assessed for validity according to the relying party's existing
configuration of trusted CAs; it is not intended to be used to
specify any change to that configuration.

Interoperability considerations:
No specific interoperability problems are known with this type,
but for recommendations relating to X.509 certificates in general,
see [PKIX].

Published specification: this memo, and [PKIX].

Applications which use this media type: TLS. It may also be used by
other protocols, or for general interchange of PKIX certificate
chains.

Additional information:
Magic number(s): DER-encoded ASN.1 can be easily recognized.
Further parsing is required to distinguish from other ASN.1
types.
File extension(s): .pkipath
Macintosh File Type Code(s): not specified

Person & email address to contact for further information:
Magnus Nystrom <magnus@rsasecurity.com>

Intended usage: COMMON

Author/Change controller:
Magnus Nystrom <magnus@rsasecurity.com>

9. Intellectual Property Rights

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in RFC2028. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this document. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.

10. Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the TLS Working Group and the WAP Security
Group. This document is based on discussion within these groups.

11. Normative References

[HMAC] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M. and R. Canetti, "HMAC:
Keyed-hashing for message authentication", RFC2104,
February 1997.

[HTTP] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
Masinter, L., Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC2616, June 1999.

[IDNA] Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, P. and A. Costello,
"Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications
(IDNA)", RFC3490, March 2003.

[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

[OCSP] Myers, M., Ankney, R., Malpani, A., Galperin, S. and
C. Adams, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure:
Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP", RFC2560,
June 1999.

[PKIOP] Housley, R. and P. Hoffman, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure - Operation Protocols: FTP and HTTP",
RFC2585, May 1999.

[PKIX] Housley, R., Polk, W., Ford, W. and D. Solo, "Internet
Public Key Infrastructure - Certificate and
Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC3280,
April 2002.

[TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version
1.0", RFC2246, January 1999.

[URI] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter,
"Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax",
RFC2396, August 1998.

[UTF8] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", RFC2279, January 1998.

[X509-4th] ITU-T Recommendation X.509 (2000) | ISO/IEC 9594-
8:2001, "Information Systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - The Directory: Public key and
attribute certificate frameworks."

[X509-4th-TC1] ITU-T Recommendation X.509(2000) Corrigendum 1(2001) |
ISO/IEC 9594-8:2001/Cor.1:2002, Technical Corrigendum
1 to ISO/IEC 9594:8:2001.

12. Informative References

[KERB] Medvinsky, A. and M. Hur, "Addition of Kerberos Cipher
Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC2712,
October 1999.

[MAILING LIST] J. Mikkelsen, R. Eberhard, and J. Kistler, "General
ClientHello extension mechanism and virtual hosting,"
ietf-tls mailing list posting, August 14, 2000.

[AESSUITES] Chown, P., "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC
3268, June 2002.

13. Authors' Addresses

Simon Blake-Wilson
BCI
EMail: sblakewilson@bcisse.com

Magnus Nystrom
RSA Security
EMail: magnus@rsasecurity.com

David Hopwood
Independent Consultant
EMail: david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk

Jan Mikkelsen
Transactionware
EMail: janm@transactionware.com

Tim Wright
Vodafone
EMail: timothy.wright@vodafone.com

14. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.

------分隔线----------------------------
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 密码: 验证码:
推荐内容